Native Teams vs G-P (Globalization Partners)
Quick answer
G-P (Globalization Partners) scores higher than Native Teams on the EOR Compare methodology, 7.7 against 7.3, a gap of 0.4 points. The biggest difference is in pricing transparency.
G-P (Globalization Partners) scores 7.7 against 7.3 for Native Teams. The gap comes mostly from pricing transparency. Native Teams publishes a starting price of 99 USD, while G-P (Globalization Partners) publishes 599 USD. Compare fees across all providers.
| Criterion | 7.3Overall score 7.3 out of 10 Native Teams | G-P (Globalization Partners), verified G-P (Globalization Partners) |
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | ||
| Compliance and entity ownership | Not the winner | Winner |
| Pricing transparency and total cost | Winner | Not the winner |
| Platform and employee experience | Not the winner | Winner |
| Support and onboarding speed | Not the winner | Winner |
| Country coverage and depth | Not the winner | Winner |
| Reputation, security and financial stability | Not the winner | Winner |
| Contract flexibility and exit terms | Winner | Not the winner |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing model | flat | flat |
| From price, USD | 99 | 599 |
| Minimum term | None | None |
| Deposit required | No | Yes |
| FX markup disclosed | No | No |
| Off-boarding fee | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | ||
| Countries covered | 95 | 156 |
| Contractors | Yes | Yes |
| Visa support | Yes | Yes |
| Equity support | No | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | No | Yes |
| Typical onboarding, days | 3 | 10 |
| Next step | Visit Native Teams website | Visit G-P (Globalization Partners) website |